Elon Musk es la persona que más dinero ha perdido en la historia.
Forbes calcula que la fortuna de Musk pasó de $320,000 millones en 2021 a $138,000 millones para enero de 2023, lo que supondría una pérdida de un 56.8% en solo un año.
Esto se debe mayormente en la compra de Twitter (ahora X) con acciones de Tesla que provocó un derrumbe de sus acciones en un 65%.
Elon Musk es la persona que más dinero ha perdido en la historia.
Forbes calcula que la fortuna de Musk pasó de $320,000 millones en 2021 a $138,000 millones para enero de 2023, lo que supondría una pérdida de un 56.8% en solo un año.
Esto se debe mayormente en la compra de Twitter (ahora X) con acciones de Tesla que provocó un derrumbe de sus acciones en un 65%.
“To the extent it is used I fear it’s often for illicit finance. It’s an extremely inefficient way of conducting transactions, and the amount of energy that’s consumed in processing those transactions is staggering,” the former Fed chairwoman said. Yellen’s comments have been cited as a reason for bitcoin’s recent losses. However, Yellen’s assessment of bitcoin as a inefficient medium of exchange is an important point and one that has already been raised in the past by bitcoin bulls. Using a volatile asset in exchange for goods and services makes little sense if the asset can tumble 10% in a day, or surge 80% over the course of a two months as bitcoin has done in 2021, critics argue. To put a finer point on it, over the past 12 months bitcoin has registered 8 corrections, defined as a decline from a recent peak of at least 10% but not more than 20%, and two bear markets, which are defined as falls of 20% or more, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
